Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Pirelli Cable Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1984No. Civ. 22855PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BYRNE, J. *

The issue presented in this appeal is whether a defendant in a small claims action may sue for malicious prosecution after he has successfully appealed a small claims judgment in the superior court, We hold that an action for malicious prosecution following a small claims appeal is precluded by the judicially created rule prohibiting actions for malicious prosecution founded on small claims and by the rule creating a conclusive presumption of probable cause based on a recovery by a plaintiff in an original action.

Facts

On September 26, 1979, Pirelli Cable Corporation…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Minasian v. SapseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Holliday v. HollidayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Stanley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Sangster v. PaetkauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Leonardini v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Chauncey v. NiemsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Bruno v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API