Legal Opinion

Bruno v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1990No. A048089PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHANNELL, J.

This petition presents the question of whether the superior court may permit discovery in a small claims appeal. We conclude that discovery is not available. However, we conclude that respondent court abused its discretion in sanctioning petitioner’s attorney for his attempt to obtain discovery.

I. Facts

On August 24, 1989, real party in interest, Arnold S. Gridley, filed an unlawful detainer action in small claims court against petitioner Diana Lynn Bruno. The complaint asked for back rent commencing in March 1989 and for the possession of the property in which petitioner…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Schweiger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. S. P. Growers Ass'n v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Pratt v. Coast Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. California Association for Safety Education v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Paduano v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. West Coast Development v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Campbell v. Cal-Gard Surety Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API