Holliday v. Holliday
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment, based on a proceeding instituted by defendants against plaintiff before a justice-of the peace, under the provisions of sections 701 to 714 of the Penal Code. The complaint contains four counts. The first count alleges that on the nineteenth day of August, 1895, in the-city of Los Angeles, the defendants^ falsely and maliciously, and without reasonable or probable cause, charged plaintiff before William Young, a justice of the peace within and for the township of Los Angeles, with having…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crescent City Live Stock Co. v. Batchers' Union Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- M'Cormick v. SissonNew York Supreme Court · 1827
- Hyde v. GreuchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
- Sandell v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Esau Awabdy v. City of Adelanto Scott Burnell Ted Hartz Richard Althouse, Michael Sakamoto, Does I-X, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Wilson v. Parker, Covert & ChidesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Halberstadt v. . New York Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Schultz v. . Greenwood CemeteryNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Richter v. NeilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.