Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wooten

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 1988No. 145 E.D. Appeal Docket 1986PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.*

This appeal presents two issues under section 9712 of the Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712, for our consideration, namely (1) whether the provision is applicable to a situation in which the defendant neither introduced the firearm into the confrontation which culminated in the prohibited act nor initially precipitated the confrontation; and (2) whether the requirement of “visible possession” must be proven by the testimony of an eyewitness who actually saw the firearm during the commission of the offense, or whether some other evidence might…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. EmerickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShambergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. BarudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. FithianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API