Legal Opinion

Burton v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 2003No. 99-CF-500PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury convicted appellant of malicious disfigurement while armed, aggravated assault while armed, and simple assault, all arising from injuries he inflicted on 66-year-old Myrtle Mackey. Appellant contends chiefly that the trial judge erroneously failed to instruct the jury on malice as an element of malicious disfigurement. It is true that in Perkins v. United States, 446 A.2d 19 (D.C.1982), the court listed as one of the elements of “the proper instruction for malicious disfigurement” whether “the defendant was acting with malice.” Id. at 26. In Comber v. United States, 584 A.2d 26…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Comber v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Perkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kitt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Swinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API