Legal Opinion

Beaner v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 2004No. 99-CF-1668, 01-CF-139PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellants Beaner and Baham were jointly tried and convicted of armed carjacking, armed robbery, aggravated assault while armed (“AAWA”), assault with a dangerous weapon (“ADW”), possession of a firearm while committing a crime of violence, and carrying a pistol without a license. On appeal they attack their convictions on several grounds. We agree that appellant Baham should have received a five-year sentence enhancement, rather than a ten-year enhancement, for his AAWA and armed robbery convictions. We also agree that both appellants’ ADW convictions merge with their…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. EdmondsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Swinton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Bolanos v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Freeman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Otts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API