Legal Opinion

Melter v. Melter

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 20, 2012No. 29192-8-IIIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, J.

¶1 A will is presumed valid but may be disregarded when a will contestant presents clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that it was the product of undue influence. John and Sandra Melter appeal the trial court’s decision to set aside the fourth and final will of John’s mother, Mary Virginia Melter, and corresponding transfers of assets that effectively disinherited his brother, William Melter, and left nearly all of her estate to John.

¶2 The evidence supports the court’s findings that John failed to account for or clearly establish his mother’s knowing consent to assets he transferred to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Dean v. JordanWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Erwin v. Cotter Health CentersWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Erwin v. Cotter Health Centers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re the Estates of JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Kitsap Bank v. DenleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. In re the Parental Rights to M.J.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Charles Taylor Ii v. Patricia Caiarelli, Respondent/crossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Estate Of Helen Correll, V Kitsap BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API