In re the Parental Rights to M.J.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtKorsmo, J.
¶1 A prisoner challenges the termination of her parental relationship with her two youngest children, arguing that the trial court did not properly consider the latest amendments to Washington’s statutory policy regarding incarcerated parents. Because of conflicting evidence, the trial court’s failure to explain its reasoning leaves us uncertain how the court applied the statute. We remand for the trial court to conduct its balancing on the record.
FACTS
¶2 Appellant A.E. is the mother of four children, the two youngest of whom are at issue in this action. A.J. is the father of the two younger…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re Welfare of ABWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Salas v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In re the Welfare of M.R.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Estill v. Sisters of CharityWashington Supreme Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- J.B. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- Department of Social & Health Services v. L.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- In re the Parental Rights to K.J.B.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Dep Of Ab., Marvin Jordan, App v. Dshs State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In Re The Dep Of N.a., John Ackah, App v. DshsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.