Legal Opinion

Kitsap Bank v. Denley

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 5, 2013No. 43282-0-IIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, C. J.

¶1 The Estate of Helen Correll (Estate) challenges Charlena Lanterno’s ownership of the funds from Helen Correll’s checking account for which Lanterno was named the payable on death (POD) beneficiary based on a claim of undue influence. The trial court granted Lanterno’s summary judgment motion. Because the trial court properly determined that Lanterno was entitled to *565summary judgment as to the undue influence claim and did not abuse its discretion in awarding Lanterno costs and attorney fees, we affirm.

FACTS

¶2 In 1993, Lanterno was employed at Washington Mutual Bank (now J.P. Morgan Chase)…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mueller v. WellsWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. RidgwayDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
  3. In Re The Estate Of: Donald C. MullerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. White v. DidricksenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Estate Of Doris MathewsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API