Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Used Car Factory, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1999No. Docket 111854PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

This civil matter was resolved when the circuit court granted summary disposition in favor of the defendant. The Court of Appeals affirmed, but we reverse in part and remand this case to the circuit court for further proceedings relating to the plaintiffs’ claim of equitable subrogation.

i

In January 1990, Michael Klecha 1 bought a 1981 Datsun from The Used Car Factory, Inc. (tucf), in Mount Clemens. 2 He told the salesperson that he was covered under an insurance policy and that he would provide proof. In fact, he was uninsured.

At the time of the purchase, an employee of TUCF filled out the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance v. Medical Protective Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Atlanta International Insurance v. BellMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Senters v. Ottawa Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Beaty v. Hertzberg & Golden, PcMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Smith v. SpragueMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In Re Kay Lorraine Lewis, Debtor. Superior Bank, Fsb v. James W. Boyd, Chapter 7 Bankruptcy TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Arthur Glick Truck Sales, Inc. v. Stuphen East Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Federal Insurance Company v. The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection And Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Auto-Owners Insurance v. Amoco Production Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Eller v. Metro Industrial Contracting, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API