Legal Opinion

State v. Graham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1983No. 201PA83PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

The State assigns as error the Court of Appeals’ holding that the defendant’s voluntary acknowledgment of his wrongdoing at an early stage of the criminal process entitled defendant to the benefit of that statutory mitigating circumstance and thus to a new sentencing hearing. We agree with the Court of Appeals’ holding, but feel we must clarify the term “the criminal process” and its time of commencement.

The evidence clearly revealed that the defendant, when first questioned prior to his arrest, denied any involvement in the break-ins. But immediately after his arrest…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. Van McDougallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. MeltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. LattimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API