Legal Opinion

Selleck v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1892PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Branch. (Loveridge, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The. facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.

This is case for negligence.

Plaintiff, a bus driver, was m route for the depot, with two passengers. Three railway tracks crossed the street near the depot. A freight train occupied one of these tracks, and obstructed the street for over 20 minutes. The conductor of the freight train had gone to dinner. Plaintiff halted his team some 3 or 4 rods south of the tracks, and waited from 10 to 15 minutes for the freight to get out of the way, or to make a cut so that he might pass. While waiting, a passenger train came along on one of the tracks north of the track occupied by the freight train,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. ReaneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Campbell v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  4. Young v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Selleck v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Davis v. ThorntonMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Denton v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. McDonald v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Tozer v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API