Legal Opinion

Young v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1885PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Oakland. (Stickney, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChampijn, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries received by plaintiff while crossing defendant’s tracks at Drayton Plains, on the 9 th day of February, 1884. The defendant’s road crosses the highway a few rods east from the depot, and at an angle somewhat less than forty-five degrees. -At this point there are two tracks : the main line, and a side track which lies north of the main line and about ten feet therefrom. The highway crossing is planked, and is about twenty feet in width. At the time of the accident the side track was occupied by a west-bound freight train which was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Gilbert v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Hassenyer v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Mann v. Central Vermont RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. PrevostMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Stowers v. Dwight Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Selleck v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Grimes v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. NeubacherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API