Legal Opinion

Campbell v. City of Stillwater

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 18, 1884PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Washington county, McCluer, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

According to the complaint, the railway company, with the consent and permission of the defendant, laid its track and operated its railroad along-side of and in places lengthwise upon one of the streets of the city. The track was so constructed that a •carriage driven even with care on or over it would be in great danger •of being overturned and broken. "Without reference to the danger from passing cars and engines, it was a dangerous place for a horse with a carriage to go. There was no fence or barrier of any kind between the part of the street occupied by the track and the part not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lamberton v. WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
  2. Nelson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Carroll v. Minnesota Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  4. Johnson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Colorado Mortgage & Investment Co. v. ReesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  4. Walrod v. Webster CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Morey v. Lake Superior Terminal & Transfer Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API