Legal Opinion

Nevin-Frank Co. v. Hubert

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1923No. 5,125PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

This is an action commenced by the Nevin-Frank Company against Rosa Hubert, as executrix of the last will and testament of John Hubert, deceased, on a promissory note executed by John Hubert to the Centennial Brewing Company in December, 1918, and by that company indorsed before maturity to the plaintiff. Hubert having died, the plaintiff as owner of the note in due time presented to the executrix a creditor’s claim based thereon. The claim set out a copy of the note, with indorsements, and contained this statement: *53“The Nevin-Frank Company is now, and since the 20th day of March, 1920, has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Elizalde v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. De Golia v. AndersenOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Scott Stamp Etc. Co., Ltd. v. LeakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Ullman Co. v. AdlerMontana Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wunderlich v. HoltMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Montana Flour Mills Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API