Legal Opinion

Wunderlich v. Holt

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1929No. 6,509PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an action to establish a claim against the estate of Charles A. Wunderlich, deceased.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff during the months of March, April, May and August to December, inclusive, 1924, and during the entire years 1925 and 1926, and from January to August, inclusive, 1927, at the request of Charles A. Wunderlich, rendered services for him in taking care of a ranch at Divide, and caring for W. F. Wunderlich, an invalid brother, for which Charles A. Wunderlich agreed to pay the reasonable value; that the services were worth $75 per month, no part of which has been paid,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. McIntyre v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Roman v. AlbertMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Roy v. King's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Marcellus v. WrightMontana Supreme Court · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Langston v. CurrieMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Pincus v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Phelps v. Union Central Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Rowe v. EggumMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Sharp v. SharpMontana Supreme Court · 1943

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API