Legal Opinion

State v. Murphy

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1995No. Cr. 940195PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

James W. Murphy has appealed a county court judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Murphy contends the trial court should have instructed the jury he had an absolute right to refuse a chemical test. We affirm.

I

On June 14, 1993, a North Dakota Highway Patrol officer observed Murphy driving a vehicle with a defective taillight. When Murphy got out of his vehicle after parking near a bar, he was approached by the officer, who observed that Murphy had a strong odor of alcohol on his breath,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Claude L. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. State v. SmudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. TweedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. ParisienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. TrosenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. JahnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API