State v. Murphy
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
James W. Murphy has appealed a county court judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Murphy contends the trial court should have instructed the jury he had an absolute right to refuse a chemical test. We affirm.
I
On June 14, 1993, a North Dakota Highway Patrol officer observed Murphy driving a vehicle with a defective taillight. When Murphy got out of his vehicle after parking near a bar, he was approached by the officer, who observed that Murphy had a strong odor of alcohol on his breath,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Claude L. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- State v. SmudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. TweedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. ParisienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. TrosenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. JahnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.