Legal Opinion

Ralston Purina Co. v. Black

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 7, 1970No. 45148PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Presiding Judge.

In an action for the balance due on a contract, plaintiff Ralston Purina appeals from a judgment *662for defendants and from the denial of its motions for a new trial and judgment n.o.v.

Mr. and Mrs. Black, tenderfoot turkey growers, entered into a Turkey Chow Contract with Ralston Purina after preliminary discussions with Ralston Purina’s agent Newton. Apparently Newton was also an agent of Swift & Company and had presented a procuring, raising and marketing package-deal to the Blacks. The written Ralston Purina contract was actually a very simple document. The company…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Irwin v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  2. Ralston Purina Co. v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Re/Max Specialists, Inc. v. KosakaiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. U. S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Mikado Custom TailorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  3. U. S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Mikado Custom TailorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API