Legal Opinion · Dissent

U. S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Mikado Custom Tailors

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1982No. 63717Published

1DissentQuillian, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. I agree that the judgment should be reversed but cannot agree that the construction of an unambiguous lease provision “must be left for resolution by a jury.” In my opinion this case should be reversed with direction that a judgment be entered for the appellant on this issue.

“The construction of a contract is a question of law for the court.” Code Ann. § 20-701 (Code § 20-701). “ ‘The construction of a contract, if needed, being a question of law for the court, as well as a duty that rests upon the court, there can be no ambiguity within the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. United American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  2. R. I. Realty Co. v. TerrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Early v. KentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  4. Landowners Co. v. PendrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Columbia Nitrogen Corp. v. Dean's Power Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API