U. S. Enterprises, Inc. v. Mikado Custom Tailors
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentQuillian, Chief Judge
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. I agree that the judgment should be reversed but cannot agree that the construction of an unambiguous lease provision “must be left for resolution by a jury.” In my opinion this case should be reversed with direction that a judgment be entered for the appellant on this issue.
“The construction of a contract is a question of law for the court.” Code Ann. § 20-701 (Code § 20-701). “ ‘The construction of a contract, if needed, being a question of law for the court, as well as a duty that rests upon the court, there can be no ambiguity within the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. United American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- R. I. Realty Co. v. TerrellNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Early v. KentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Landowners Co. v. PendrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Columbia Nitrogen Corp. v. Dean's Power Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.