Legal Opinion

Ralston Purina Co. v. Woody

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 15, 1969No. 44546PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

The plaintiff brought a complaint alleging the defendant was indebted to it on a promissory note attached to the complaint, which states as consideration for the promise “For value received.” The defendant’s answer denied the indebtedness and alleged that the plaintiff agreed that the consideration for the note was that the plaintiff would supply chickens to him and feed them, and the plaintiff did not feed the birds and this constituted a breach of the contract and *470failure of consideration. The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant rendered upon a jury verdict.

Submit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. AkridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Woody v. Ralston Purina CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Ray v. MarettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ralston Purina Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API