Tidal Oil Co. v. Roelfs
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by F. E. Roelfs against the Tidal Oil Company (formerly Okla. Oil Company.) Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, for the purpose of forfeiting an oil and gas lease for failure to develop the leased premises in accordance with the terms of the lease. Hereafter, for convenience, the parties will be designated “plaintiff” and “defendant,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.
When the cause was first reached for trial the court below refused to enter a decree of forfeiture at that time, but entered an order allowing the defendant, who was the lessee, 60 days within which to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cook v. WarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hughes v. Samedan Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Herrington v. HacklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Cobb v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Romans v. ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Rosen v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.