Legal Opinion
United Advertising Corp. v. Metuchen
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 17, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
76 N.J. Super. 301 (1962)
184 A.2d 441
UNITED ADVERTISING CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BOROUGH OF METUCHEN AND IRVING T. WOERNER, BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTOR, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided September 17, 1962.
Mr. Martin J. Loftus for the plaintiff (Miss Marilyn H. Loftus, attorney).
Mr. Robert F. Moss for the defendants.
CONVERY, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
This is an action in lieu of prerogative writs wherein plaintiff challenges the validity of the defendant borough's zoning ordinance which prohibits off-premise outdoor advertising signs throughout the entire…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Vickers v. Tp. Committee of Gloucester Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- United Advertising Corp. v. Borough of RaritanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Fischer v. Township of BedminsterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Fanale v. Borough of Hasbrouck HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Norate Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Schloss v. JamisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964