Legal Opinion
United States v. Peter Licavoli, Sr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1979No. 77-1381PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Peter Licavoli, Sr. appeals his conviction for receiving stolen goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2315. Licavoli contends that the district court should have suppressed evidence obtained through the use of electronic surveillance devices. He also argues that the court committed reversible error in several trial rulings concerning the admissibility or sufficiency of evidence and in other aspects of the conduct of the trial. We affirm the conviction.
I
The Investigation and Trial
In March 1976, a federal judge authorized agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to install…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dalia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Arthur TortorelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- United States v. Clyde Major Thompson, AKA Clyde JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Vito Spillone, United States of America v. John Clyde Abel, United States of America v. Frank CitroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. William L. Scholl, United States of America v. William L. SchollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. SouthardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Karen Kennedy v. Los Angeles Police Department City of Los Angeles James J. King Stanley A. SchottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.