Legal Opinion
Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1968No. 20803_1PublishedCited by 172 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Turner and Verdugo were convicted under an indictment charging that on or about July 28, 1964, in San Francisco, California, they fraudulently and knowingly sold and concealed and facilitated the sale, concealment and transportation of 2.695 grams of heroin which had been imported into the United States unlawfully, as appellants knew.
The government’s evidence as to the transaction was as follows. Prior to July 28, Agent Chesley of the Federal Narcotics Bureau received information from an informer named Wilson that appellant Verdugo was dealing in narcotics. On that…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- United States v. Charles Demore JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Roy Arthur NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Janice Weston, A/K/A Janice WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Leonard PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.