Legal Opinion

Rosenbluth v. Sackadorf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover damages for the fraud of defendants in procuring favorable determinations by the Office of Price Administration and the Municipal Court as to their good faith in representing that they sought possession of an apartment, occupied by plaintiff, for the purpose of making alterations. Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. (David v. Fayman, 273 App. Div. 408.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur. [190 Misc. 665.]

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. David v. FaymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Rosenbluth v. SackadorfNew York Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lyster v. BerberichNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  2. Schussel v. Jamaica Investors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Calvin v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Wigod v. Janina Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Dumas v. ProchazkaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API