Legal Opinion

Wigod v. Janina Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings and for summary judgment pursuant to rules 112 and 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

In their complaint, plaintiffs set forth two causes of action, both of which seek the recovery of damages. The first cause of action is brought pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3) of subdivision (h) of section 8 of the Business Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.), and the second is to recover damages for common-law fraud. Under the first cause of action the plaintiffs allege that the landlord, by letter dated January 15, 1948, fraudulently induced them…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosenbluth v. SackadorfNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Rosenbluth v. SackadorfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wigod v. Janina Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API