Legal Opinion
David v. Fayman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 5, 1948PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.
The complaint is attacked for insufficiency. It attempts to set forth two causes of action for damages: one for fraud and deceit and the other for conspiracy to defraud. The plaintiff is a former tenant of a one-family dwelling house owned by defendant Fayman, at Neponsit, Queens County. Defendant Haim, who succeeded plaintiff as Fayman’s tenant, is alleged to have been a co-conspirator with Fayman in procuring plaintiff’s eviction.
The complaint alleges that in October, 1946, Fayman filed a petition with the Office of Price Administration for a certificate permitting him to institute summary…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crouse v. . McVickarNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Parker v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ross v. PrestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by25 opinions
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Varga v. ParelesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Crawford v. PituchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Behrendt v. RassmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- 524 East 73rd St. Garage, Inc. v. Pantex Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.