Legal Opinion

In Re Crane

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1914No. Crim. No. 560PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Chief of Police of the City and County of San Francisco' on behalf of a party charged with violating the law in regard to the time of payment of wages. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The court is prepared to render its decision from notes made at the argument.

In this proceeding the petitioner seeks by habeas corpus to be released from the custody of the chief of police of the city and county of San Francisco, who held and confined the petitioner in the city prison under a warrant of arres't which was issued out of the police court of said city and county upon a complaint which charged the petitioner with the commission of a misdemeanor in this, that he had violated the provisions of section 1 of an act entitled “An act providing for the time of payment of…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. HolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. In Re MoffettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API