Legal Opinion

Goldenberg v. Zirinsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 24, 1906PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Solom m Goldenberg, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 16th day of March, 1906, denying the plaintiff’s motion to vacate a previous order for the examination of the plaintiff before trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

This is an action for alleged personal injuries, and on the 15th day of February, 1906, an ex parte order was granted, on the application of the defendant, directing the examination of the plaintiff before trial, and directing that he submit to a physical examination, it being provided in such order that the defendant might have a physician of his own choosing present at such examination, a like privilege being accorded to the plaintiff. The plaintiff being a non-resident, the order directed that service be made upon plaintiff’s attorney, and stayed all further proceedings until…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tebo v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Campbell v. Joseph H. Bauland Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Del Ra v. VaughanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Del Ra v. VaughanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  3. Burton v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Horowitz v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1939
  5. Swiatlowski v. KasprzykNew York Supreme Court · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API