Horowitz v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtLivingston, J.
In this action to recover damages for personal injuries, a motion has been made by defendant, pursuant to the provisions of section 306 of the Civil Practice Act, for the physical examination of one of the plaintiffs. Defendant asserts a right to have the court direct the examining physician to deliver to it, but not to plaintiff, a copy of the report. Plaintiff claims an equal right to a copy. There appears to be some confusion on this subject.
The admonition that “ While adhering strictly to the fundamental and unchanging rights of security of person and property, we must dictate our…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Lyon v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Goldenberg v. ZirinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Hayt v. Brewster, Gordon & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Mizak v. Carborundum Co.New York Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Del Ra v. VaughanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Callan v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Swiatlowski v. KasprzykNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Di Salvo v. Di GiacomoNew York Supreme Court · 1956