Legal Opinion
Burton v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 14, 1990No. 1 CA-SA 90-032PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHELLEY, Judge.
Warren Burton (petitioner) had an industrial injury to his right thumb and wrist on February 20, 1980, while working for Bechtel Power Company (Bechtel). Bechtel was covered by a workmen’s compensation policy issued by Industrial Indemnity (Industrial). Bechtel and Industrial will collectively be referred to as respondents.
Burton’s claim was accepted for benefits and eventually closed at one time with a scheduled injury with a 75% impairment of the upper extremity.
In 1984, petitioner succeeded in re-opening his claim because his condition had worsened and he had problems…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Superior Court in and for County of CochiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Southwestern Iron & Steel Industries, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Goldenberg v. ZirinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Pedro v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kwietkauski v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Freelance Interpreting Services, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Burton v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Martens v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005