Legal Opinion
Del Ra v. Vaughan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 10, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bergan, J. P.
In granting defendant’s motion to direct a physical examination of plaintiff Julia A. Del Ba who sues for personal injuries, the court at Special Term has imposed as a *157condition the requirement that a copy of the examining physician’s report be sent to the attorney for the plaintiff.
Such a requirement has been sanctioned in the Second Department (Tutone v. New York Cons. R. R. Co., 189 App. Div. 954; Goldenberg v. Zirinsky, 114 App. Div. 827), but not in the First or Fourth Departments. (Cf. Feinberg v. Fairmont Holding Corp., 272 App. Div. 101; Mizak v. Carborundum Co., 151 App.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goldenberg v. ZirinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Mizak v. Carborundum Co.New York Supreme Court · 1912
- Tutone v. New York Consolidated RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jakubowski v. LengenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Lapera v. ShafronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Murray v. Specialty Chemicals Co.New York Supreme Court · 1979
- Adlerstein v. South Nassau Communities HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Evens v. Denny's, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.