Fensterer & Voss Inc. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
It is stipulated in this case that the merchandise consists of “goblets and other plain glass stemware, composed of blown bowls with molded stems and feet, molded glass the component material of chief value.”
A further stipulation provides that the merchandise is in all material respects similar to that which was passed upon by this court in United States v. Fondeville (7 Ct. Cust. Appls. 135; T. D. 36457).
The goods were assessed with duty at the rate of 55 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 218 of the tariff act of 1922. The parts of said paragraph pertinent to this case are as follows:
* * *…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. FondevilleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Jeffrey Martin, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Stroheim v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Tex Mex Brick & Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.