Jeffrey Martin, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kao, Chief Judge:
This protest presents for decision the question of the proper rate of duty to be assessed against an importation of merchandise invoiced as “Superior Car Polishers.” The customs officer at the port of entry classified the importation under item 386.50 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as other cotton *534articles not specially provided for, not ornamented, and accordingly assessed duty thereon at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem.
It is the contention of plaintiff that this merchandise should be assessed with duty at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nix v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Fensterer & Voss Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mitsugi Higashi v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Garza v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- West Coast Cycle Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971