State v. Rosado
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEAR, J.
The defendant, Geraldo Rosado, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of conspiracy to commit murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-54a. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion for judgment of acquittal, (2) failed to provide a requested charge to the jury and (3) abused its discretion in precluding cross-examination of a state’s witness with regard to statements made by a third party. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- United States v. James Pedroza, Francisco C. Pelaes, Jose Perez, and Enrique Jesus OsornoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GaliciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- State v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. PughConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. WashingtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. MorganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.