Legal Opinion

State v. Rosado

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 3, 2012No. AC 33523PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEAR, J.

The defendant, Geraldo Rosado, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of conspiracy to commit murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 53a-54a. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion for judgment of acquittal, (2) failed to provide a requested charge to the jury and (3) abused its discretion in precluding cross-examination of a state’s witness with regard to statements made by a third party. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have found the following…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. VitaleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. United States v. James Pedroza, Francisco C. Pelaes, Jose Perez, and Enrique Jesus OsornoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. State v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. State v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. GaliciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. State v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  3. State v. PughConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. State v. WashingtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. State v. MorganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API