Legal Opinion

United States v. James Pedroza, Francisco C. Pelaes, Jose Perez, and Enrique Jesus Osorno

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 11, 1984No. 136, 139, 141, 142, Dockets 84-1160 to 84-1163PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEARSE, Circuit Judge:

Defendants James Pedroza, Francisco C. Pelaes, Jose Perez, and Enrique Jesus Osorno appeal from judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, after a jury trial before Lee P. Gagliardi, Judge, convicting them on one count of kidnaping Luis Almeida (“Luis”) and transporting him in interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1) (1982), and one count of conspiring to commit those acts, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(c) (1982). On appeal, defendants contend, inter alia, that the trial court erred in refusing to…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API