State v. Pugh
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLavine, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly admitted into evidence, under the spontaneous utterance exception to the rule against hearsay, statements made by the victim relating to the unexpected presence of her former boyfriend, the defendant Matthew Pugh, whom she feared. The defendant appeals from his conviction, following a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a(a) and burglary in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-101(a)(2). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court: (1) abused its discretion by…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. VegaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. JacksonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. Daren Y.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- State v. DubuissonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. PughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.