Los Angeles Brush Manufacturing Corp. v. James
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft
This is a motion for leave to file a petition for mandamus by the Los Angeles Brush Manufacturing Corporation, against a Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. The petitioner is a defendant in two patent suits pending in that court, in one of which the Stabler Parker Company is complainant ; and W. B. Clancy and others are complainants in the other. The suits are bills in equity brought to restrain the defendant from infringement of a patent for a new and improved brush. The defendant answered and the complainants moved to set the two cases for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Jackson Ex Dem. Astor v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Ex Parte AbduSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
3Cited by92 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.