Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Brush Manufacturing Corp. v. James

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 3, 1927PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

This is a motion for leave to file a petition for mandamus by the Los Angeles Brush Manufacturing Corporation, against a Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. The petitioner is a defendant in two patent suits pending in that court, in one of which the Stabler Parker Company is complainant ; and W. B. Clancy and others are complainants in the other. The suits are bills in equity brought to restrain the defendant from infringement of a patent for a new and improved brush. The defendant answered and the complainants moved to set the two cases for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Jackson Ex Dem. Astor v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  4. Ex Parte AbduSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API