Legal Opinion

McNamara v. Picken

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 4, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-1051Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SCOTT A. McNAMARA, M.D., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. Civil Action No. 11-1051 (ESH/JMF) CATHERINE A. PICKEN, M.D., et al., Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. MEMORANDUM OPINION In my Memorandum Order of August 29, 2012 I granted in part and denied in part Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant to Produce Documents and Hard Drives in Response to Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs’ Rule 34 Request for Production of Documents [#37]. Memorandum Order [#52]. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant (“Picken”) seeks…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  3. Tequila Centinela, S.A. de C.V. v. Bacardi & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Miller v. HolzmannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  5. Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API