Legal Opinion
Covad Communications Company v. Revonet Inc
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 17, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2006-1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case has been referred to me for discovery disputes. Defendant Revonet filed a Motion to Compel [# 44] in September, 2008 seeking more complete responses to some interrogatories and responses generally to requests for production of documents and admissions. I granted that Motion on May 29, 2009 and concurrently directed Covad to show cause why it should not have to reimburse Revonet for the fees and costs it incurred in bringing the motion. See Covad Comm’cns Co. v. Revonet, Inc., 258 F.R.D. 17, 24-25 (D.D.C.2009); see…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Henry Hendler, Paul Garrett, Tillie Goldring, as Trustees, and Henry Hendler and Irving Gronsky v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Sharon Bonds v. District of Columbia and Director, District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- DL v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Council for Tribal Employment Rights v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Bachemin v. DDMS, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023
- Martinez v. Asian 328, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- McNamara v. PickenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.