Legal Opinion
Miller v. Holzmann
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 31, 2006No. Civil Action No. 95-1231 (RCL/JMF)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Currently pending and ready for resolution is Relator Richard F. Miller’s Motion to Compel Discovery Responses from Defendant Bilhar International Establishment f/k/a Harbert International Establishment (“MTC”) [#378]. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
Relator propounded 15 interrogatories, 84 requests for admission, and 46 requests to produce documents to this defendant, which I shall call “Bilhar.”
I. Interrogatories
Bilhar declined to answer any of the interrogatories on the grounds…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pleasants v. AllbaughDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Disability Rights Council of Greater Washington v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Willingham v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Sigmund v. Starwood Urban Retail VI, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
3Cited by17 opinions
- Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. CafesjianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- JACOB SLATER & another v. TRAYNOR MANAGEMENT, INC., & another.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- Glock, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
- Rendon Group, Inc. v. RigsbyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Advantage Industrial Systems, LLC v. Aleris Rolled Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.