Legal Opinion
Tillison v. City of San Diego
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 9, 2005No. 03-55939PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Chief Judge:
A towing company challenges California Vehicle Code section 22658(l)(1). This statute provides that when a towing company tows a vehicle from private property without the vehicle owner’s permission, the company must obtain written authorization from either the property- owner or the property owner’s agent. It also requires that the property owner or agent be present for the tow.
The district court enjoined enforcement of section 22658(l)(1) as preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA) of 1994, 49 U.S.C. §§ 14501-05. The district court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of Columbus v. Ours Garage & Wrecker Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Crane Towing, Inc. v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Ace Auto Body & Towing, Ltd. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Tocher v. City of Santa AnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Puente Arizona v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Vrc LLC v. City of Dallas Don Bearden Marcus Currie Does 1-30, City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Cardenas v. McLane Foodservices, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- California Tow Truck Associati v. City and County of San FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.