Legal Opinion

Cardenas v. McLane Foodservices, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 8, 2011No. Case SACV 10-473 DOC (FFMx)PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.

Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 214) and Defendant McLane Foodservice, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against Plaintiffs Regarding Piece-Rate Pay Formula Claims, Meal and Rest Break Claims and PAGA Claims (Dkts. 218, 224). The Court has considered the moving, opposing, and replying papers, as well as oral argument, and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Tan v. Grubhub, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  2. Vasserman v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
  3. Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Bluford v. Safeway Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Oman v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API