Legal Opinion

Puente Arizona v. Joseph Arpaio

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 2, 2016No. 15-15211, 15-15213, 15-15215PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

An immigrant advocacy organization, Puente Arizona, along with individual unauthorized aliens 1 and taxpayers of Mari-copa County (collectively “Puente”), challenge provisions of Arizona’s identity theft laws which prohibit using á false identity to obtain employment. The district court found the laws facially preempted by federal immigration policy and granted a preliminary injunction, preventing the Arizona government defendants (collectively “Arizona”) from enforcing the challenged pro: visions. Arizona appeals that preliminary injunction, and defendant…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Juan Hernandez v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Where Do We Go Berkeley v. CaltransCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  3. FTC v. Consumer Defense, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. George Young, Jr. v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Alika Atay v. County of MauiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API