Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Nixon

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8147PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From tire Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorben, J.

— Action by the appellant against the appellees for partition. The complaint, after entitling the cause and stating the names of the parties, was as follows:

“ The plaintiff complains of the defendants, and says that she and they are the owners in fee simple and tenants in common of the following described real estate situated in Pike county and State of Indiana, to wit:(description.) “That one Thomas J. Conger departed this life intestate, and seized in fee simple of said real estate, on the 1st day of March, 1856, leaving neither widow nor children surviving him, but leaving as his only…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Steeple v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Hosford v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Bowen v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Nicholson v. CaressIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Fite v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1821

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. JamesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Bernhard v. WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Blake v. MinknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Wilmore v. StetlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Korf v. GerichsIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API