Legal Opinion
Tannenbaum v. Nationwide Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 28, 2010No. 100 MAP 2007PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.1
This appeal requires assessment of the scope of an offset provision of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law.
In December 2000, Alan Tannenbaum, M.D. (“Appellee”), suffered severe injuries in a motor vehicle accident, rendering him permanently disabled from his previous hospital employment. In addition to Social Security disability payments, Appellee applied for and received income-loss benefits under a group plan provided by the hospital, as well as further benefits pursuant to two personal disability policies. He also commenced a civil action against the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Maloney v. VALLEY MEDICAL FACILITIES, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Johnson v. BeaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Program Administration Services, Inc. v. Dauphin County General AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Insurance Co. Of North America v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oliver v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- AAA Mid-Atlantic Insurance v. RyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Stermel v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Smith v. RohrbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Petrochko v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.