Insurance Co. Of North America v. Continental Casualty Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
Restaurateurs are familiar with the good-natured struggles which often ensue when guests attempt to pick up the tab for their dinner companions. It may be fanciful to assume that it was to avoid similar unseemly displays when the time came to pay a casualty loss that insurance companies incorporated “other insurance clauses” in their policies. Certainly, there is one dramatic difference between those generous diners, would-be hosts, and the insurers— the diner pleads for the opportunity to pay the bill; the insurer’s use of the “other insurance” clause…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Continental Cas. Co. v. WeekesSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Grasberger v. Liebert & Obert, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Walter v. DunlapCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Northeast Department Ilgwu Health and Welfare Fund and Sol Hoffman v. Teamsters Local Union No. 229 Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Institute for Shipboard Education v. Cigna Worldwide Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- CC Housing Corp. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Puritan Insurance Company v. Canadian Universal Insurance Company, Ltd., D/B/A Canadian Universal Insurance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.