Legal Opinion
United States v. Cantu
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided December 31, 1985No. PCR 85-00472-RV, 85-00473-RVPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
VINSON, District Judge.
The defendants in these cases, either individually or by adoption of co-defendants’ motions, have moved to suppress (1) the contents of conversations recorded pursuant to a court-authorized interception of wire communications, and (2) any evidence derived from the contents of such conversations. 1 In its response to the motions and throughout the subsequent proceedings, the Government has maintained that the defendants have failed to make the requisite showing necessary to entitle them to an evidentiary hearing. In the absence of any clear…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Vito Giacalone (87-1924), Mario Agosta (87-1931), Albert Hady (87-1932), Jack v. Giacalone (87-1933), Anthony D. Giacalone (87-1934)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Paredes-MoyaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1989
- State v. ManesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- United States v. Karl Weber, Robert Lee Hill, Jr., Don WalleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- State v. PerrySuperior Court of Delaware · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.