Legal Opinion
United States v. Vito Giacalone (87-1924), Mario Agosta (87-1931), Albert Hady (87-1932), Jack v. Giacalone (87-1933), Anthony D. Giacalone (87-1934)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1988No. 87-1924, 87-1931 to 87-1934PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Defendants, Vito Giacalone, Jack Giacal-one, Albert Hady, and Mario Agosta, appeal their convictions for conspiring to participate in the affairs of a criminal enterprise formed for the purpose of collecting illegal gambling debts, in violation of the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). Defendant Anthony Giacalone appeals his conviction for conducting an illegal gambling business, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955. Each of the defendants received prison sentences ranging from one to five years. The defendants initially…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Paul Corrado (98-2269) Nove Tocco (98-2270) Vito William Giacalone (98-2365)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Germaine HeltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Alfredo Rodriguez-SuazoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Leonardo ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.