Legal Opinion
State v. Perry
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided May 3, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPPITI, Judge.
This matter is presently before the Court on defendants’ motions to suppress wiretap evidence. In its response to the motions, the State maintained that the defendants’ have failed to make the requisite showing to entitle them to an evidentiary hearing on the suppression issues. I agreed with the State and on the record February 5, 1990, decided that the suppression issues could be decided as a matter of law without a hearing. See Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1977); United States v. Cantu, 625 F.Supp. 656 (N.D.Fla.1985), aff'd, 791…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- State of Delaware v. Jermaine BrinkleySuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
- State v. CastroSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019
- State v. FeltonSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
- State v. MackSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.